Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+1020%
5345
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
477
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
-
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
2880
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
28
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
GT200B
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
