GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Arc A350 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (2000MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+73%
5345
Arc A350
3072
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 700
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
2880
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
