GeForce 705A vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 705A and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 705A Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 705A
91
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+13471%
12350
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700A
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
950.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
7.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
AD107
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
