FireMV 2400 PCI vs Radeon HD 6250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireMV 2400 PCI Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
Radeon HD 6250 Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
