NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2520MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+746%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
144
3584
Shading Units
18432
224
TMUs
576
96
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
AD102
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
