NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W4300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+668%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Bonaire
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
