NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+315%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1600
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cypress
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
