NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+13612%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cedar
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
