Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
RV516
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy