NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2150MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X
+100%
22.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
80
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
5120
224
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 21
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
