NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1531MHz vs 1410MHz)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+15%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 10
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
70
3584
Shading Units
4480
224
TMUs
280
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GA100
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
