NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
18192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+15487%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
30
18432
Shading Units
240
576
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
28
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
289W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
