NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
18304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+23905%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
16
18432
Shading Units
128
576
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
150W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G92B
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
