Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +5%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy