Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1290MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 FHHL +639%
13.21 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1290 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
412.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
26.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.21 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
6.605 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy