NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+872%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2020
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
448
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
150W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
