NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
15936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (600W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+5000%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
16384
56
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
600W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
100 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
