Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1530MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +727%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
640
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Volta
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
47W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy