Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1480MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 DGXS +655%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy