NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1180MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M6
+2%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Tesla M6
+45%
3008
Quadro K5200
2072
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2304
96
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK110B
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
