NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
+362%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
