Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +650%
9.999 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net