Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +389%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP104
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy