Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile +189%
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
9
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1152
56
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP106
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy