NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+380%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
384
208
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GK107
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
