NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+735%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2496
Shading Units
192
208
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF106
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
