NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100
+372%
16.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
2496
Shading Units
5120
208
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GV100
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
