NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+144%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
+61%
55
Quadro K2200
34
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
640
208
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GM107
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
