NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+1332%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2496
Shading Units
96
208
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF108
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
