NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+2937%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2496
Shading Units
48
208
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GT216
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
