NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+2460%
34.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
80
512
Shading Units
10240
64
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
