Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID M40

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +67%
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2016
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net