Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +4795%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G98
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
23W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy