Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +52%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
837 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM107
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy