Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +5947%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G98
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy