NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+122%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GT200B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
