NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+307%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
112
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
