NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
+194%
3.031 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
