NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+437%
5.53 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
