NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+786%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
448
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
