NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+346%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
154W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
