NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
+40%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK107
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
