NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+186%
1.709 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
30
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
