NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1335MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
+99%
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
