NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+26%
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
