NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+120%
1.094 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
