AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
We compared two Game console GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 Go GPU and 512MB VRAM Xbox 360 GPU 80nm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (28W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z2 Go GPU
+1627%
4.147 TFLOPS
Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Oct 2007
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.147 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
28W
TDP
175W
-
-
-
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Rembrandt+
GPU Name
Xenos Falcon
100-000001672
GPU Variant
Crayola 6
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
0.232 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
