Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU

AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU

We compared two Game console GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 Go GPU and 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2700MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z2 Go GPU +799%
4.147 TFLOPS
Atari VCS 400 GPU
0.461 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2020
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
DDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.804 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.41 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
922.4 GFLOPS
4.147 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
461.2 GFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt+
GPU Name
Banded Kestrel
100-000001672
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
4.94 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
210 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net