Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (1800MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A6000 +1534%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

84
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
10752
Shading Units
1536
336
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy