NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+1591%
38.71 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
1536
336
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
